Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
7-7-2026
Keywords
Algorithmic Governance, Social Health Policies, Communication Ecologies
School
McAnulty College and Graduate School of Liberal Arts
Primary Author Department
Rhetoric and Communication Department
Abstract
The promises of artificial intelligence (AI) as a solution to challenges facing health systems increasingly link technological innovation with improvements in efficiency and access. However, the legitimacy of AI-supported health policies depends not only on scientific competence but also on public trust in scientific institutions. Using data from the international Trust in Science Project (71,922 respondents across 68 countries), this study analyses multidimensional trust and communication ecologies to reconstruct relational configurations of trust, termed ‘Figures of Relevance’. Findings reveal that whilst scientific competence is widely recognised, perceptions of institutional openness vary markedly, shaping heterogeneity in trust. The study identifies four distinct trust configurations linked to demographic and communicational factors. These insights inform a preliminary framework for designing AI-enabled health social policies that emphasise institutional openness and tailored communication strategies, aiming to strengthen legitimacy and equitable social inclusion in health governance. Thus, rather than treating trust as an individual attribute, the study reconstructs relational configurations through which scientific legitimacy is experienced.
Rights
© 2026 Kochav Koren. This work is made available for educational and scholarly purposes.
Open Access
Yes
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Repository Citation
Koren, K. (2026). Phenomenological Analysis of Trust in Science for the Design of AI-Based Health and Social Policies. Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/faculty/1631
Included in
Health Communication Commons, Medical Humanities Commons, Rhetoric Commons, Speech and Rhetorical Studies Commons