Duquesne Law Review
Abstract
The United States Supreme Court has held that use and derivative use immunity is coextensive with the privilege against self-incrimination and is therefore sufficient to compel testimony over a claim of the privilege.
Kastigar v. United States, 406 U.S. 441, rehearing denied, 408 U.S. 931 (1972).
First Page
714
Recommended Citation
Howard B. Zavodnick,
Constitutional Law - Fifth Amendment - Compelled Testimony - Use and Derivative Use Immunity,
11
Duq. L. Rev.
714
(1973).
Available at:
https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol11/iss4/15