Criminal Law - Rape - Sufficiency of Evidence to Support Conviction - Corroboration of Complainant's Testimony

Authors

Constance A. Hill

Abstract

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals had held that corroboration of a mature complainant's testimony is no longer required to sustain a conviction for rape, abrogating its corroboration rule.

Arnold v. United States, 358 A.2d 335 (D.C. Ct. App. 1976) (en banc).

First Page

305

Recommended Citation

Constance A. Hill, Criminal Law - Rape - Sufficiency of Evidence to Support Conviction - Corroboration of Complainant's Testimony, 15 Duq. L. Rev. 305 (1976).
Available at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol15/iss2/10