Duquesne Law Review
Abstract
The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has held that when a driver of an automobile is injured by a "second collision" with a defectively designed automobile headrest caused by a collision with another car whose driver was negligent, the plaintiff has the burden of showing how the damages should be apportioned between the manufacturer of the headrest and the negligent driver.
Huddell v. Levin, 537 F.2d 726 (3d Cir. 1976).
First Page
733
Recommended Citation
Carl Harvison,
Products Liability - Second Collision - Enhanced Injuries - Apportionment of Damages,
15
Duq. L. Rev.
733
(1977).
Available at:
https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol15/iss4/10