•  
  •  
 

Duquesne Law Review

Authors

Sylvia Denys

Abstract

federal district court in Texas has denied a plaintiff a private cause of action under section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act on the grounds that implying a private cause of action is contrary to both legislative intent and the purpose of section 503, and that it interferes with state regulations.

Rogers v. Frito-Lay, Inc., 433 F. Supp. 200 (N.D. Tex. 1977).

First Page

481

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS