federal district court in Texas has denied a plaintiff a private cause of action under section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act on the grounds that implying a private cause of action is contrary to both legislative intent and the purpose of section 503, and that it interferes with state regulations.
Rogers v. Frito-Lay, Inc., 433 F. Supp. 200 (N.D. Tex. 1977).
Employment of the Handicapped - The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 § U.S.C. 793 - Section 503,
Duq. L. Rev.
Available at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol16/iss3/14