Zoning - Constitutionality of Exclusionary Zoning Ordinance - Fair Share

Authors

Sally A. Davoren

Abstract

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that a suburban zoning ordinance which limited multi-family dwellings to a forty-three acre commercial district was unconstitutionally exclusionary, since it did not provide a fair share of the township's 3,800 acres for development of multi-family dwellings.

Surrick v. Zoning Hearing Board, 382 A.2d 105 (Pa. 1977).

First Page

507

Recommended Citation

Sally A. Davoren, Zoning - Constitutionality of Exclusionary Zoning Ordinance - Fair Share, 17 Duq. L. Rev. 507 (1978).
Available at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol17/iss2/11