Duquesne Law Review
Abstract
The United States Supreme Court has held that the fourth amendment does not require that a Title III electronic surveillance order include a specific authorization for law enforcement officers to covertly enter the premises described in the order to install a listening device.
Dalia v. United States, 441 U.S. 238 (1979)
First Page
351
Recommended Citation
Gregory R. Lyons,
Constitutional Law - Fourth Amendment - Search and Seizure - Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 - Electronic Surveillance - Covert Entry,
18
Duq. L. Rev.
351
(1980).
Available at:
https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol18/iss2/10