A Response to Sherk: Chagrin without Despair and Hope without Presumption

Authors

William A. Donaher

Abstract

This article examines defense of misuse under Pennsylvania strict product liability law in light of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's recent decision in Sherk v. Daisy-Heddon. The author criticizes the plurality opinion and suggests that the approach taken by the dissent represents the ideal in strict product liability law.

First Page

917

Recommended Citation

William A. Donaher, A Response to Sherk: Chagrin without Despair and Hope without Presumption, 21 Duq. L. Rev. 917 (1983).
Available at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol21/iss4/4