This article examines defense of misuse under Pennsylvania strict product liability law in light of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's recent decision in Sherk v. Daisy-Heddon. The author criticizes the plurality opinion and suggests that the approach taken by the dissent represents the ideal in strict product liability law.
William A. Donaher,
A Response to Sherk: Chagrin without Despair and Hope without Presumption,
Duq. L. Rev.
Available at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol21/iss4/4