Evidence - Prior Inconsistent Statement of a Non-Party Witness

Authors

Joanna K. Budde

Abstract

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has rejected the long established, orthodox rule and embraced the modern rule which allows, as substantive evidence, the prior inconsistent statements of a non-party witness available for crossexamination.

Commonwealth v. Brady, 510 Pa. 123, 507 A.2d 66 (1986).

First Page

121

Recommended Citation

Joanna K. Budde, Evidence - Prior Inconsistent Statement of a Non-Party Witness, 26 Duq. L. Rev. 121 (1987).
Available at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol26/iss1/9