Intellectual Property - Patent Law - Interferences

Authors

Warren M. Haines II

Abstract

The Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that the quantum of proof for priority is clear and convincing evidence, and that corroboration of inventor's testimony will be evaluated by the "rule of reason."

Price v. Symsek, 988 F.2d 1187 (Fed. Cir. 1993).

First Page

149

Recommended Citation

Warren M. Haines II, Intellectual Property - Patent Law - Interferences, 32 Duq. L. Rev. 149 (1993).
Available at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol32/iss1/6