A New Challenge to Miranda: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Mid-Interrogation Miranda Warnings and the Admissibility of Subsequent Confessions: Missouri v. Siebert

Authors

Mitchell W. Paterline

Abstract

The Supreme Court held that, in a continual custodial interrogation, when Miranda warnings are given after a suspect has confessed they do not effectively protect the privilege against self-incrimination and that any subsequent confessions made should be suppressed.

Missouri v. Seibert, 124 S. Ct. 2601 (2004).

First Page

299

Recommended Citation

Mitchell W. Paterline, A New Challenge to Miranda: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Mid-Interrogation Miranda Warnings and the Admissibility of Subsequent Confessions: Missouri v. Siebert, 43 Duq. L. Rev. 299 (2005).
Available at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol43/iss2/9