Where Parties Have Manifested Their Intentions in a Final, Exclusive, and Fully Integrated Agreement, That Writing Will Be the Only Evidence of Their Agreement: Yocca v. The Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc.

Authors

Matthew A. Meyers

Abstract

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that where there is a fully integrated written agreement, evidence of a prior agreement is barred from inclusion in the final written agreement by the parol evidence rule, and any reliance on those prior agreements is unjustified.

Yocca v. The Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc., 854 A.2d 425 (2004).

First Page

497

Recommended Citation

Matthew A. Meyers, Where Parties Have Manifested Their Intentions in a Final, Exclusive, and Fully Integrated Agreement, That Writing Will Be the Only Evidence of Their Agreement: Yocca v. The Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc., 43 Duq. L. Rev. 497 (2005).
Available at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol43/iss3/9