Canine Sniffs and the Admissibility of Evidence Seized during Lawful Traffic Stops: Illinois v. Caballes

Authors

Jennifer M. Palonis

Abstract

The United States Supreme Court held that a canine sniff conducted without reasonable, articulable suspicion of criminal activity during a lawful traffic stop did not violate the Fourth Amendment.

Illinois v. Caballes, 125 S. Ct. 834 (2005).

First Page

173

Recommended Citation

Jennifer M. Palonis, Canine Sniffs and the Admissibility of Evidence Seized during Lawful Traffic Stops: Illinois v. Caballes, 44 Duq. L. Rev. 173 (2005).
Available at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol44/iss1/12