Limitations on Campaign Contributions and Expenditures Are Invalid for Lack of Legitimate Governmental Interest and Insufficient Tailoring: Randall v. Sorrell

Authors

Matt Monsour

Abstract

The Supreme Court of the United States held that Act 64, Vermont's campaign finance law, was in contravention of the First Amendment guarantees of freedom of speech and freedom of association with respect to the statute's contribution and expenditure limitations.

Randall v. Sorrell, 126 S. Ct. 2479 (2006).

First Page

781

Recommended Citation

Matt Monsour, Limitations on Campaign Contributions and Expenditures Are Invalid for Lack of Legitimate Governmental Interest and Insufficient Tailoring: Randall v. Sorrell, 45 Duq. L. Rev. 781 (2007).
Available at: https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol45/iss4/7