Duquesne Law Review
Abstract
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that an audiotape played at a public preliminary criminal hearing was a public judicial record or document; therefore, it is subject to the presumption of openness, and the public is entitled to have access to review and copy such evidence.
Commonwealth v. Upshur, 924 A.2d 642 (Pa. 2007).
First Page
657
Recommended Citation
Nicole L. Klos,
Audiotapes Heard at Preliminary Criminal Hearings Are Regarded as Public Judicial Records Subject to the Presumption of Openness Associated with Criminal Trials and Are Accessible to the Public for Duplication: Commonwealth v. Upshur,
46
Duq. L. Rev.
657
(2008).
Available at:
https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol46/iss4/7