Duquesne Law Review


I agree with what I understand to be Professor Katz's main thesis: that cold war disputes are presently nonjusticiable. But I dissent from his conclusion that these disputes should be considered as entirely outside the mainstream of international adjudicatory developments. His position flows, I believe, from his willingness to attribute to the differences between the main powers a uniqueness which they do not, in any general appraisal, deserve.

First Page


Included in

Law Commons