Duquesne Law Review
Abstract
Wacky, chaotic, lovable. These are just a few words used to describe mascots of all types, especially the Phillie Phanatic. The Phanatic is arguably one of the most well-known and recognizable mascots in sports. Its taunting of opposing teams and goofy yet aggressive personality have shifted the mascot landscape; as the way mascots are perceived continues to change, so does the number of teams hoping to use them.1 The Phanatic's antics at games have led to trouble more than a few times, gaining it the title of the mostsued mascot in sports.2 Nonetheless, the Phanatic is a cherished part of Philadelphia sports and is indispensable to the Philadelphia Phillies's brand. Therefore, when the creators of the Phanatic threatened to make it a "free agent," the Phillies were rightfully concerned and took to the courts to try to save their beloved mascot.3
First Page
147
Recommended Citation
Olivia C. Giles,
The Phillie Phanatic Hits Free Agency: An Analysis of Phillies v. Harrison and the Application of Copyright Law to Mascots as Characters,
62
Duq. L. Rev.
147
(2024).
Available at:
https://dsc.duq.edu/dlr/vol62/iss1/19