Defense Date
11-19-2013
Graduation Date
Spring 2014
Availability
Immediate Access
Submission Type
thesis
Degree Name
MS
Department
Computational Mathematics
School
McAnulty College and Graduate School of Liberal Arts
Committee Chair
Patrick Juola
Committee Member
John Kern
Committee Member
Donald Simon
Keywords
Authorship Attribution, JGAAP, Open Class
Abstract
In this paper, we seek to describe, test, evaluate, and compare methods of open class attribution that utilize multiple unique closed class attributions in a voting framework. By applying statistical techniques to the proportion of closed class attributions indicating individual candidate authors, we seek to determine if the author is present in a set of suspected authors or not. The final answer to an open class attribution problem is either one of the authors in the set of candidate authors or "None of the above." We test nine different methods of open class attribution grouped into three distinct voting paradigms. We find that the most effective method is a voting method in which each closed class attribution votes equally for its top two most likely authors. Accuracies in this method are statistically better than chance and, in total, are the best out of all nine methods.
Format
Language
English
Recommended Citation
Overly, J. (2014). The Open Class Authorship Attribution Problem: A Comparison of Mixture-of-Experts Methods within the JGAAP Framework (Master's thesis, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1003