Defense Date
11-19-2009
Graduation Date
Spring 2010
Availability
Immediate Access
Submission Type
dissertation
Degree Name
PhD
Department
Philosophy
School
McAnulty College and Graduate School of Liberal Arts
Committee Chair
Fred Evans
Committee Member
George Yancy
Committee Member
Silvia Benso
Committee Member
Daniel Selcer
Keywords
Embodiment, Intersubjectivity, Levinas, Merleau-Ponty, Plasticity, Sensation
Abstract
The phenomenological approaches to embodiment presented by Levinas and Merleau-Ponty cannot provide an adequate account of bodily identity because their methodological commitments forbid them from admitting the central role that sensation plays in the constitution of experience. This neglect is symptomatic of their tradition's suspicion toward sensation as an explanatory concept, a suspicion stemming from Kant's critique of empiricist metaphysics and Husserl's critique of psychologism and objectivism. By contrast, I suggest that only with a robust theory of sensation can the integrity of the body and its relations be fully captured. I therefore develop--contra Kant and Husserl's idealism--a realist conception of sensation that is at once materialist and phenomenological.
Format
Language
English
Recommended Citation
Sparrow, T. (2010). Sensation Rebuilt: Carnal Ontology in Levinas and Merleau-Ponty (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/1228