The Single Leg Squat Test: A "Top-Down" or "Bottom-Up" Functional Performance Test?

DOI

10.26603/001c.21317

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Date

4-1-2021

Publication Title

International journal of sports physical therapy

Volume

16

Issue

2

First Page

360

Last Page

370

ISSN

2159-2896

Keywords

ankle, foot posture, functional performance test, lower extremity, movement system

Abstract

Background: Medial knee deviation (MKD) during the single leg squat test (SLST) is a common clinical finding that is often attributed to impairments of proximal muscular structures. Investigations into the relationship between MKD and the foot and ankle complex have provided conflicting results, which may impact clinicians' interpretation of the SLST. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) and foot posture in subjects that perform the SLST with MKD (fail) versus without MKD (pass). Hypothesis: There will be a difference in ankle dorsiflexion ROM and/or foot posture between healthy individuals that pass and fail the SLST for MKD. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Sixty-five healthy, active volunteers (sex = 50 female, 15 male; age = 25.2 +/- 5.6 years; height = 1.7 +/- .1 m; weight = 68.5 +/- 13.5 kg) who demonstrated static balance and hip abductor strength sufficient for performance of the SLST participated in the study. Subjects were divided into pass and fail groups based on visual observation of MKD during the SLST. Foot Posture Index (FPI-6) scores and measures of non-weight bearing and weight bearing active ankle dorsiflexion (ROM) were compared. Results: There were 33 individuals in the pass group and 32 in the fail group. The groups were similar on age (p = .899), sex (p = .341), BMI (p = .818), and Tegner Activity Scale score (p = .456). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups on the FPI-6 (pass group mean = 2.5 +/- 3.9; fail group mean = 2.3 +/- 3.5; p = .599), or any of the measures of dorsiflexion range of motion (non-weight bearing dorsiflexion with knee extended: pass group = 6.9 +/- 3.7, fail group = 7.8 +/- 3.0; non-weight bearing dorsiflexion with knee flexed: pass group = 13.5 +/- 5.6, fail group = 13.9 +/- 5.3; weight bearing dorsiflexion: pass group = 42.7 +/- 6.0, 42.7 +/- 8.3, p = .611). Conclusions: Failure on the SLST is not related to differences in clinical measures of active dorsiflexion ROM or foot posture in young, healthy individuals. These findings suggest that clinicians may continue using the SLST to assess neuromuscular performance of the trunk, hip, and knee without ankle dorsiflexion ROM or foot posture contributing to results. Level of Evidence: Level 3.

Open Access

OA

Preprint

Additional Link

Link to Full Text

Share

COinS