Junior and Collegiate Tennis Players Display Similar Bilateral Asymmetries of Humeral Retroversion

DOI

10.4085/1062-6050-0686.20

Authors

Daniel C. Hannah, aInstructor, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA dahannah@augusta.edu.
Jason S. Scibek, bAssociate Professor, Department of Athletic Training, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA scibekj@duq.edu.
Christopher R. Carcia, cAssociate Professor, Department of Kinesiology, Colorado Mesa University, Grand Junction, CO, USA ccarcia@coloradomesa.edu.
Amy L. Phelps, dAssistant Professor, Palumbo Donahue School of Business, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA phelpsa@duq.edu.

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Date

4-13-2021

Publication Title

Journal of athletic training

Keywords

humeral retrotorsion, humeral torsion, overhead athlete, sport-specific adaptation, upper extremity

Abstract

CONTEXT: Overhead throwing athletes consistently display significant bilateral differences in humeral retroversion (HRV). However, there is limited evidence regarding HRV asymmetries in tennis players despite similarities between the overhead throw and tennis serve. OBJECTIVE: To determine if junior and collegiate tennis players demonstrate bilateral differences in HRV, and whether the magnitude of the side-to-side difference (HRVΔ) was similar across different age groups. DESIGN: Cross-Sectional Study Setting: Field-Based Patients or Other Participants: Thirty-nine healthy tennis players were stratified into three age groups: Younger Juniors (n = 11; age = 14.5 ± 0.5 years), Older Juniors (n = 12; age = 17.1 ± 0.9 years), and Collegiate (n = 16; age = 19.6 ± 1.2 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Three-trial means were calculated for HRV for the dominant and nondominant limbs, and HRVΔ was calculated by subtracting the mean of the nondominant side from the dominant side. Paired-sample t-tests were utilized to determine bilateral differences in HRV, while a one-way ANOVA was used to compare HRVΔ between groups. RESULTS: For all three groups, HRV was significantly greater in the dominant arm compared to the nondominant arm (Younger Juniors: dominant = 62.8° ± 9.1° vs nondominant = 56.3° ± 6.8°, P = .039; Older Juniors: dominant = 75.5° ± 11.2° vs nondominant = 68.6° ± 14.2°, P = .043; Collegiate: dominant = 71.7° ± 8.5° vs nondominant = 61.2° ± 6.9°, P = .001). However, no significant differences were detected in HRVΔ when compared across age groups (P = .511). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with studies involving overhead throwing athletes, tennis players demonstrated significantly greater measures of HRV in the dominant limb. Further, the development of HRV asymmetries appear to have occurred prior to the teenage years as no changes were observed in HRVΔ between age groups.

Open Access

OA

Preprint

Additional Link

Repository Citation

Hannah, D. C., Scibek, J. S., Carcia, C. R., & Phelps, A. L. (2021). Junior and Collegiate Tennis Players Display Similar Bilateral Asymmetries of Humeral Retroversion. Journal of athletic training. https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0686.20